Over Two-Thirds Consider An Exterior Evaluation of AI Implementations Is the Greatest Method to Establish AI Security and Safety Points
HackerOne, a frontrunner in human-powered safety, revealed knowledge that discovered 48% of safety professionals consider AI is essentially the most important safety threat to their group. Forward of the launch of its annual Hacker-Powered Safety Report, HackerOne revealed early findings, which embrace knowledge from a survey of 500 safety professionals. In terms of AI, respondents had been most involved with the leaking of coaching knowledge (35%), unauthorized utilization of AI inside their organizations (33%), and the hacking of AI fashions by outsiders (32%).
When requested about dealing with the challenges that AI security and safety points current, 68% stated that an exterior and unbiased evaluation of AI implementations is the best strategy to determine AI security and safety points. AI crimson teaming provides such a exterior evaluation by the worldwide safety researcher neighborhood, who assist to safeguard AI fashions from dangers, biases, malicious exploits, and dangerous outputs.
“Whereas we’re nonetheless reaching trade consensus round AI safety and security greatest practices, there are some clear techniques the place organizations have discovered success,” stated Michiel Prins, co-founder at HackerOne. “Anthropic, Adobe, Snap, and different main organizations all belief the worldwide safety researcher neighborhood to offer knowledgeable third-party perspective on their AI deployments.”
Additional analysis from a HackerOne-sponsored SANS Institute report explored the impression of AI on cybersecurity and located that over half (58%) of respondents predict AI might contribute to an “arms race” between the techniques and strategies utilized by safety groups and cybercriminals. The analysis additionally discovered optimism round using AI for safety workforce productiveness, with 71% reporting satisfaction from implementing AI to automate tedious duties. Nonetheless, respondents believed AI productiveness good points have benefited adversaries and had been most involved with AI-powered phishing campaigns (79%) and automatic vulnerability exploitation (74%).
“Safety groups should discover the very best purposes for AI to maintain up with adversaries whereas additionally contemplating its present limitations — or threat creating extra work for themselves,” stated Matt Bromiley, Analyst at The SANS Institute. “Our analysis suggests AI ought to be considered as an enabler, relatively than a risk to jobs. Automating routine duties empowers safety groups to deal with extra strategic actions.”
Join the free insideAI Information newsletter.
Be part of us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/InsideBigData1
Be part of us on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/insideainews/
Be part of us on Fb: https://www.facebook.com/insideAINEWSNOW
